FACULTY OF ARCHITECTURE
CITY AND REGIONAL PLANNING
Course Name  
Semester Course Code Theoretical / Practice time ECTS
Course Degree Bachelor's degree
Course Language Turkish
Format of Delivery: Face to Face
Course Coordinator Assoc. Prof. Dr.Mehmet Çağlar MEŞHUR
Coordinator e-mail mcmeshur yahoo.com
Instructors
Asistant Instructors
Course Objectives Discussing the decision making and implementation process of urban projects.
Basic Sciences Engineering Scinces Social Sciences Educational Sciences Artistic sciences Medical Science Agricultural sciences
0 40 40 0 20 0 0
Course Learning Methods and Techniquies
Week Course Content Resource
1 The dynamic feature of urban planning as a "process" R.Raci Bademli (1991) "Kent Planlamasında Yeni Gündem: Kentsel Proje Vurgulu Eylemli Planlama", Kent Kooperatifçiliği Altıncı Teknik Semineri, Ankara. (in Turkish)
2 The urban planning thougt, implementation of planning decisions, the process from thought to fact. Meslekte Uzmanlık Ayrımı Komisyonu (1995) "Şehir Planlama Mesleğinin Tanımı, Çalışma ve Yetki Alanları", Planlama, 95/3-4, Sayı:13, TMMOB Şehir Plancıları Odası Yayını, Ankara. (in Turkish)
3 The actors/disciplines of planning implementation (urban planners, geomatic engineers, architects, civil enginners) Planlama Dergisi (1997), "Kentsel Tasarım Sayısı", TMMOB Şehir Plancıları Odası, 1997 / 2, Ankara. (in Turkish)
4 Different approcahes / perspectives of actors to the urban practices, conflicts and disagreements. Planlama Dergisi (1997), "Kentsel Tasarım Sayısı", TMMOB Şehir Plancıları Odası, 1997 / 2, Ankara. (in Turkish)
5 The main cases of urban practices: plan, program, project and funds. R.Raci Bademli (1991) "Kent Planlamasında Yeni Gündem: Kentsel Proje Vurgulu Eylemli Planlama", Kent Kooperatifçiliği Altıncı Teknik Semineri, Ankara. (in Turkish)
6 The project cycle: project thought, project design, cost-benefit analysis and project implementation. Lecture notes.
7 The actors of decision making process: politicians, bureaucrats, professionals and voluntary organizations. Planlama Dergisi (1997), "Kentsel Tasarım Sayısı", TMMOB Şehir Plancıları Odası, 1997 / 2, Ankara. (in Turkish)
8 An important question for urban projects: serving public interest or not? Personal archieve of Instructor.
9 Discussions on some urban projects in which dominance of political interest. Personal archieve of Instructor.
10 The case study/survey on some urban projects in Konya. Annual municipality reports.
11 Midterm
12 Discussions on that urban practices should be for urban comfort, not only for economic efficiency. Murat KARAYALÇIN (2010) Konut Bunalımı, Kent Rantları ve Proje Muhafazları, İmge Kitabevi, Ankara. (in Turkish)
13 The case study/survey on some urban projects in Konya. Annual municipality reports.
14 The handicaps for urban projects in which giving more care to economic efficiency than urban comfort. Personal archieve of Instructor.
15 The problems arising from the dominance of construction sectors in decision making process of urban projects. Murat KARAYALÇIN (2010) Konut Bunalımı, Kent Rantları ve Proje Muhafazları, İmge Kitabevi, Ankara. (in Turkish)
Assesment Criteria   Mid-term exam Final exam
  Quantity Percentage Quantity Percentage  
Term Studies : - - - -
Attendance / Participation : - - 1 10
Practical Exam : - - - -
Special Course Exam : - - - -
Quiz : - - - -
Homework : 1 20 1 30
Presentations and Seminars : - - - -
Projects : - - - -
Workshop / Laboratory Applications : - - - -
Case studies : - - - -
Field Studies : - - - -
Clinical Studies : - - - -
Other Studies : - - - -
Mid-term exam   1 20 - -
Final exam   - - 1 20
ECTS WORK LOAD TABLE   Number Duration
Course Duration : 14 2
Classroom Work Time : 4 10
Presentations and Seminars : - -
Course Internship : - -
Workshop / Laboratory Applications : - -
Field Studies : - -
Case studies : - -
Projects : - -
Homework : 2 12
Quiz : - -
Mid-term exam : 1 12
Final Exam : 1 16
ECTS 4
No COURSE LEARNING OUTCOMES CONTRIBUTION
D.Ö.Ç. 1 Analyzes the urban practices in cause-effect relation. Interrogates, but do not blame. 3
D.Ö.Ç. 2 Explains the role of different actors in urban practices. 4
D.Ö.Ç. 3 Analyzes the reason of conflicts between public and political interest for urban projects. 3
D.Ö.Ç. 4 Assessing the urban projects and practices with respect to their application process, not the results. 3
D.Ö.Ç. 5 Knows that the decision making process of urban projects should base on negotiation. 3
* 1: Zayıf - 2: Orta - 3: İyi - 4: Çok İyi
COURSE LEARNING OUTCOMES AND PROGRAM OUTCOMES AND RELATIONSHIPS MATRIX

DÖÇ1DÖÇ2DÖÇ3DÖÇ4DÖÇ5DÖÇ6DÖÇ7DÖÇ8DÖÇ9DÖÇ10DÖÇ11DÖÇ12DÖÇ13DÖÇ14DÖÇ15DÖÇ16DÖÇ17DÖÇ18DÖÇ19DÖÇ20
PÇ1
PÇ2
PÇ3
PÇ4
PÇ5
PÇ6
PÇ7
PÇ8
PÇ9
PÇ10
PÇ11
PÇ12
PÇ13
PÇ14
PÇ15
PÇ16
PÇ17
PÇ18
PÇ19
PÇ20