FACULTY OF ARCHITECTURE
CITY AND REGIONAL PLANNING
Course Name   SPATIAL RISK MITIGATION PLANNING (ELECTIVE)
Semester Course Code Theoretical / Practice time ECTS
6 3503658 2 / 0 4
Course Degree Bachelor's degree
Course Language Turkish
Format of Delivery: Face to Face
Course Coordinator Assist. Prof. Dr. Arzu TAYLAN SUSAN
Coordinator e-mail ataylan selcuk.edu.tr
Instructors
Yrd. Doç. Dr. Arzu TAYLAN SUSAN
Asistant Instructors
Course Objectives To increase the awareness on the reasons of the rising spatial risks at the regional and urban scales and to develop the knowledge, understanding and ability on necessary risk mitigation pland and policies for creating disaster resilient cities in terms of risk analysis, management and reduction.
Basic Sciences Engineering Scinces Social Sciences Educational Sciences Artistic sciences Medical Science Agricultural sciences
10 20 70 0 0 0 0
Course Learning Methods and Techniquies
Oral explanation, discussion, presentation
Week Course Content Resource
1 Introduction and Overview: The Components of Disaster and Risk and Their Different Types SMITH, K. (1998) Environmental Hazards ? Second Edition, Assessing risk and reducing disaster, Routledge, London and New York. UN/ISDR (2009) United Nations International Strategy For Disaster Reduction Terminology.
2 Increasing Impacts of Disasters and the Significance of Risk Mitigation The Relationship of Disaster with Development and Urbanization BLAIKIE, P. CANNON, T. DAVIS, I. WISNER, B. (1994) At Risk ? Natural hazards, peoples vulnerability, and disasters, Routledge, London and New York. UNDP (2004) A Global Report: Reducing Disaster Risk ? A Challenge for Development, United Nations Development, Programme, New York, USA
3 Traditional Disaster Management from Disaster Point of View: Post- Disaster Stages, Planning of Temporary and Permanent Housing Settlements TMMOB (2007) Afet Sempozyumu Bildiriler Kitabı, Ankara.
4 Different Approaches to Disaster and Risk: Geogprahers Spatial Point of View, Political Economy Point of View, Social Vulnerability Approach ALBALA-BERTRAND, J. M. (1993). Political economy of large natural disasters: with special reference to developing countries. OUP Catalogue. BURBY, R.J. (1998) Cooperating with Nature: Confronting Natural Hazards with Land-Use Planning for Sustainable Communities, Joseph Henry Press: Washington D.C.CUTTER, S. L., BORUFF, B. J., & SHİRLEY, W. L. (2003). Social vulnerability to environmental hazards*. Social science quarterly, 84(2), 242-261.
5 International Risk Reduction Policy Approach, Sustainability and Planning BALAMIR, M. (2001) Disaster Policies and Social Organisation, Paper to be presented at the 5th Conference of ESA, Helsinki, August 28-September 1, 2001. EL-MASRI, S. and TIPPLE, G. (2002). ?Natural Disaster, Mitigation and Sustainability: The Case of Developing Countries?. International Planning Studies, 7:2, 157-175.
6 Natural Disaster Risk Management and Planning, Stages, Principles, Actors and their Roles BURBY, R.J. (1998) Cooperating with Nature: Confronting Natural Hazards with Land-Use Planning for Sustainable Communities, Joseph Henry Press: Washington D.C. IDB (2003). ?The Notion of Disaster Risk ? Conceptual Framework for Integrated Management?, Information and Indicators Program for Disaster Risk Management, Instituto de Estudius Ambientales IDEA- UN, Manizales- Colombia
7 The Principles and Stages of Spatial Risk Mitigation Planning BERKE, P. R. (1995) Natural-hazard reduction and sustainable development: A global assessment, Journal of Planning Literature, May95, Vol. 9 Issue 4, p370, 13p. GODSCHALK, D.R. KAISER, E.J. and BERKE, P. (1998). ?Integrating Hazard Mitigation and Local Land Use Planning?. In Burby, R.J. (ed.) Cooperating with Nature: Confronting Natural Hazards with Land-Use Planning for Sustainable Communities, Joseph Henry Press: Washington D.C.
8 Spatial Risk Mitigation Planning: Method of Analyses and Spatial Strategies at the Regional Scale BIRKMANN, J. (2007) ?Risk and vulnerability indicators at different scales: Applicability, usefulness and policy implications.? Environmental Hazards 7:20?31. DAMM, M., FEKETE, A. and BOGARDI, J. J n.d. ?Intersectoral vulnerability indices as tools for framing risk mitigation measures and spatial planning.? Public Health. BRATA, A. G. (2010) ?Regional Development for a Disastrous Country.? Review Literature And Arts Of The Americas 2010:28?29.
9 Spatial Risk Mitigation Planning: Method of Analyses and Spatial Strategies at the Urban Scale BURBY, R.J. (1998) Cooperating with Nature - Confronting Natural Hazards with Land-Use Planning for Sustainable Communities. Joseph Henry Press: Washington D.C. KATURI, A. K., SHARIFI, M.A. and VAN WESTEN, C. J. (2004) ?Urban mapping and land use acterisation for risk assessment.? in Commission VI, WG VI/4. TÜDEŞ, Ş. and GÜLTEKIN, Y ( 2009) ?Evaluation of Relationship of Spatial Planning-Georisks and Urban Risk Analysis?: The Case Study of Bartin.? G.U. Journal of Science 22(4):395?411.
10 Developing Spatial Risk Mitigation Policies: Risk Perception, Governance and Participation ADPC. 2010. Urban Governance and Community Resilience Guides, Planning for Disaster Risk Reduction. edited by Gabrielle Iglesias. The Asian Disaster PReparedness Center (ADPC). BURBY, R. J. (2001) ?Involving citizens in hazard mitigation planning?: making the right choices.? Australian Journal of Emergency Management 45?51.
11 MIDTERM EXAMINATION
12 Disasters, Risks and Their Management in Turkey: Approaches and Changes in Different Periods BALAMIR, M. (2001) Disaster Policies and Social Organisation, Paper to be presented at the 5th Conference of ESA, Helsinki, August 28-September 1, 2001.KELEŞ, R. (2004). ?Turkish Government Structure from a Disaster Management Perspective?. In Demeter K., Guner A., Erkan N. E., (eds.) The Role of Local Governments in Reducing the Risk of Disasters, Center of Local Government Studies and Training, Marmara University, Istanbul.
13 Spatial Risk Mitigation Strategies and Legal-Administrative Legislation and Experiences BALAMIR, M. (2001) Disaster Policies and Social Organisation, Paper to be presented at the 5th Conference of ESA, Helsinki, August 28-September 1, 2001.KELEŞ, R. (2004). ?Turkish Government Structure from a Disaster Management Perspective?. In Demeter K., Guner A., Erkan N. E., (eds.) The Role of Local Governments in Reducing the Risk of Disasters, Center of Local Government Studies and Training, Marmara University, Istanbul.
14 Student Presentations: Country Examples for Spatial Risk Analysis Research of students on the ed subjects
15 Student Presentations: Country Examples for Spatial Risk Mitigation Planning Research of students on the ed subjects
Assesment Criteria   Mid-term exam Final exam
  Quantity Percentage Quantity Percentage  
Term Studies : - - - -
Attendance / Participation : 10 5 4 4
Practical Exam : - - - -
Special Course Exam : - - - -
Quiz : - - - -
Homework : - - - -
Presentations and Seminars : - - 1 26
Projects : - - - -
Workshop / Laboratory Applications : - - - -
Case studies : - - - -
Field Studies : - - - -
Clinical Studies : - - - -
Other Studies : - - - -
Mid-term exam   1 35 - -
Final exam   - - 1 30
ECTS WORK LOAD TABLE   Number Duration
Course Duration : 14 2
Classroom Work Time : 14 2
Presentations and Seminars : 1 18
Course Internship : - -
Workshop / Laboratory Applications : - -
Field Studies : - -
Case studies : - -
Projects : - -
Homework : - -
Quiz : - -
Mid-term exam : 1 20
Final Exam : 1 26
ECTS 4
No COURSE LEARNING OUTCOMES CONTRIBUTION
D.Ö.Ç. 1 The students may have the knowledge on the concepts of disaster and risk and the concepts of disaster and risk management in terms of their similar and different aspects. 3
D.Ö.Ç. 2 The students may have the knowledge, understanding and ability to search and discuss the socio-economical processes that cause the production of spatial risks at the regional and urban scales from a critical point of view. 3
D.Ö.Ç. 3 The students may have knowledge on international disaster and risk policies and the experiences of various countries. 4
D.Ö.Ç. 4 The students may have the fundamental knowledge to analyze spatial risks. 4
D.Ö.Ç. 5 The students may have the knowledge and ability on the methodology and instruments of spatial risk mitigation planning to a disaster resillient community. 4
D.Ö.Ç. 6 The students may have understanding on the relationship of planning with various professional fields during the risk management and they may have the ability to work together in a multi-disciplinary environment. 3
D.Ö.Ç. 7 The students may have the knowledge on the legal and administrative regulations involved with the spatial risk mitigation in Turkey. 4
* 1: Zayıf - 2: Orta - 3: İyi - 4: Çok İyi
COURSE LEARNING OUTCOMES AND PROGRAM OUTCOMES AND RELATIONSHIPS MATRIX

DÖÇ1DÖÇ2DÖÇ3DÖÇ4DÖÇ5DÖÇ6DÖÇ7DÖÇ8DÖÇ9DÖÇ10DÖÇ11DÖÇ12DÖÇ13DÖÇ14DÖÇ15DÖÇ16DÖÇ17DÖÇ18DÖÇ19DÖÇ20
PÇ1
PÇ2
PÇ3
PÇ4
PÇ5
PÇ6
PÇ7
PÇ8
PÇ9
PÇ10
PÇ11
PÇ12
PÇ13
PÇ14
PÇ15
PÇ16
PÇ17
PÇ18
PÇ19
PÇ20